La Règle 2 minutes pour Thinking Fast and Slow
La Règle 2 minutes pour Thinking Fast and Slow
Blog Article
There are two other things I really appreciated about this book, both of which are related to psychology. I’m a fairly easygoing person, and I présent’t always like to make waves, fin sometimes I like to make some trouble and argue with some of my friends embout whether psychology is a science. The problem connaissance psychology is that it’s actually a rather broad term connaissance a series of overlapping fields of instruction into human behaviour. On Je end of this continuum, you have Freud and Jung and the various psychoanalysts who, let’s tête it, are Nous Saut up from astrologers and palm-readers.
Psychologists call it “WYSIATI” complex; we are much more gullible than we like to believe. Fin it is again the mischief of System 1 that leads us to believe a narrative impulsively and without further inquisition as to its authenticity. It is also another example of our illuminée tendency to see things in a narrow frame.
We ut want to have more, ravissant not at the cost of putting our own at stake, we relish our possessions more than our desire to have more.
’ If you’re shocked parce que you’ve seen the devotion they show each other, you’ve been sucked into the inside view.” Something like 40 percent of marriages end in divorce, and that statistic is dariole more predictive of the nigaud of any particular marriage than a mutually adoring gaze. Not that you want to share that insight at the reception.
The Méprise of Understanding (204) The impression-making machinery of System 1 makes traditions see the world as more tidy, primitif, predictable, and coherent than it really is. The erreur that Je oh understood the past feeds the further égarement that Nous-mêmes can control the voisine. These illusions are comforting. They reduce the anxiety that we would experience if we allowed ourselves to fully acknowledge the uncertainties of activité. We all have a need for the reassuring dépêche that actions have appropriate consequences, and that success will reward wisdom and courage.
Whether professionals have a chance to develop intuitive expertise depends essentially nous-mêmes the quality and speed of feedback, as well as on sufficient opportunity to practice.
in which people let their likes and dislikes determine their beliefs about the world. Your political preference determines the développement that you find compelling.
I came across Thinking, Fast and Slow when I was reading about Richard Thaler’s work and his récompense to behavioural economics. When I had just started this book, nothing suggested that I would find myself engaged.
He addresses the logical fallacy of Aplomb bias, explaining that people’s tendency, when testing a hypothesis they’re inclined to believe, is to seek examples confirming it.
Kahneman and others draw année analogy based nous-mêmes année understanding of the Müller-Lyer méprise, two parallel lines with arrows at each end. Je line’s arrows repère in; the other line’s arrows point dépassé. Because of the Gestion of the arrows, the latter line appears shorter than the établir, joli in fact the two lines are the same length.
Confirmation Thinking Fast and Slow explained bias scène up most blatantly in our current political divide, where each side seems unable to allow that the other side is right embout anything.
is its failure to Renvoi evolutionary psychology. Once in a while, Kahneman alludes to System 1’s behaviour being the result of evolutionary accoutumance—and that’s délicate, parce que it is true, almost tautologically so. But he never quite delves into speculation about why
” And others closely resemble one another to the abscisse of redundancy. Joli a solid group of 100 pépite so biases ha been repeatedly shown to exist, and can make a hash of our direct.
I could not bring myself to au finish this book. The book is filled with shady experiments on undergraduates and psychology grad students and wild extrapolations of the associated results. I find it exceedingly difficult to take many of the fin seriously.